From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>
The driver sometime use the term 'rate_id' to identify a retry policy
(which is in fact a series of rate IDs). This is misleading.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
index 77fb104efdec..caeaf836147f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
@@ -285,15 +285,14 @@ static void wfx_tx_fixup_rates(struct ieee80211_tx_rate *rates)
rates[i].flags &= ~IEEE80211_TX_RC_SHORT_GI;
}
-static u8 wfx_tx_get_rate_id(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
- struct ieee80211_tx_info *tx_info)
+static u8 wfx_tx_get_retry_policy_id(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
+ struct ieee80211_tx_info *tx_info)
{
bool tx_policy_renew = false;
- u8 rate_id;
+ u8 ret;
- rate_id = wfx_tx_policy_get(wvif,
- tx_info->driver_rates, &tx_policy_renew);
- if (rate_id == HIF_TX_RETRY_POLICY_INVALID)
+ ret = wfx_tx_policy_get(wvif, tx_info->driver_rates, &tx_policy_renew);
+ if (ret == HIF_TX_RETRY_POLICY_INVALID)
dev_warn(wvif->wdev->dev, "unable to get a valid Tx policy");
if (tx_policy_renew) {
@@ -301,7 +300,7 @@ static u8 wfx_tx_get_rate_id(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
if (!schedule_work(&wvif->tx_policy_upload_work))
wfx_tx_unlock(wvif->wdev);
}
- return rate_id;
+ return ret;
}
static int wfx_tx_get_frame_format(struct ieee80211_tx_info *tx_info)
@@ -382,7 +381,7 @@ static int wfx_tx_inner(struct wfx_vif *wvif, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
req->peer_sta_id = wfx_tx_get_link_id(wvif, sta, hdr);
// Queue index are inverted between firmware and Linux
req->queue_id = 3 - queue_id;
- req->retry_policy_index = wfx_tx_get_rate_id(wvif, tx_info);
+ req->retry_policy_index = wfx_tx_get_retry_policy_id(wvif, tx_info);
req->frame_format = wfx_tx_get_frame_format(tx_info);
if (tx_info->driver_rates[0].flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_SHORT_GI)
req->short_gi = 1;
--
2.33.0
