On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:03 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Right, except that wireless really is different in that for one you > > can't really usefully have multiple virtual interfaces unless you're > > making an AP > > Well it may be possible later in STA too, but that is just me looking at > a crystal ball. Well, it _is_ possible, but not standards compliant ;) Stefano is, I think, the only person who has ever tested my firmware patch. > > (and I think it's unlikely you'd want that in an AP, and > > even if I'm not willing to support it, > > You mean AP VLANs? I thought you added that code already. I don't > follow. Well, I don't see a point in allowing them in different network namespaces. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
