Search Linux Wireless

Re: Backporting CVE-2020-3702 ath9k patches to stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 12:27:10AM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 01:35:05PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
It is sad, but Qualcomm support said that they have fixed it in their
proprietary driver in July 2020 (so more than year ago) and that open
source drivers like ath9k are unsupported and customers should not use
them :( And similar answer is from vendors who put these chips into
their cards / products.

Is there a public statement that says that? Right now the MAINTAINERS
file says it's "supported" and if it's not the case we should at least
fix that and consider deprecating it if it's really orphaned.

FWIW there's still quite a few OpenWrt devices that are using ath9k and
ticking away happily. And we are some that do still care about ath9k,
even if QCA doesn't... As the email that started this thread also shows,
I suppose?

Thats obviously true, and if there are people who care about this then
they should both get the tools needed from the community to do their
work as well as the credit for getting the work done.

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux