On 2021-08-13 18:11, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 17:16 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
yes, it should have some flag/logic to check whether it is BIGTK.
If you know it, you can tell me. :)
Uh, actually, we don't have a secure indication of BIGTK getting used
until after the 4-way-HS.
>
Yes, the lower driver also have the max power limit itself. If power
calulated
from the fake beacon is bigger than the max power limit, then it will
be
ignored.
Right.
>
The Transmit Power Envelope is not existed in the assoc response, it
is
existed
in beacon. So it can not use assoc response.
Right.
Given this discussion, I think we should just leave it as is, and
simply
not assume that the TPE is protected by beacon protection or such.
There
are a number of other similar parameters, and doing some real
protection
at this level would likely require further spec changes.
Thanks.
I will leave it as is without change for BIGTK.
I will change others patch and send new version.
johannes
