Some cores are getting a revision greater that 99 thus messing up
the column alignment in the list of cores. So adding a digit for
the core revision.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
index 85653a95a60c..da4fd40b5275 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static int brcmf_chip_cores_check(struct brcmf_chip_priv *ci)
int idx = 1;
list_for_each_entry(core, &ci->cores, list) {
- brcmf_dbg(INFO, " [%-2d] core 0x%x:%-2d base 0x%08x wrap 0x%08x\n",
+ brcmf_dbg(INFO, " [%-2d] core 0x%x:%-3d base 0x%08x wrap 0x%08x\n",
idx++, core->pub.id, core->pub.rev, core->pub.base,
core->wrapbase);
--
2.27.0
