On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:41 AM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:14:28 +0300 > >> Note this patch effects only 5000 HW (nor 3946 or 4965) so doesn't >> resolve or create any regression. Anyhow it was thoroughly tested. > > You haven't learned the first time. > > This kind of stuff is not appropriate outside of the merge window, I'm > not pulling this change into my tree if John tries to send it to me. I really really really really don't understand what is wrong with this. This is new hardware portion of the driver in 2.6.27 which can be even compiled out with IWL5000. This was not part of 2.6.26. Sorry for asking again how this is differing from ath9k patches just accepted. Please answer this even if you have to be rude your way. This is serious bug as radio is not configured properly affect greatly radio performance up to disconnection. We've limited the number of lines to minimum just to address THE specific problem and tested it properly. This bug was introduced in the merging window and discovered after it was closed there is nothing I can do about that unfortunate timing. Even if you don't accept this patch here it is, it fixes the problem in 2.6.27 this is the bottom line, maybe someone find it useful. Best regards Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
