On 4/6/21 7:06 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
On 06.04.2021 12:00, Kalle Valo wrote:
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 29.03.2021 00:54, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
Hi,
It looks like rtlwifi/rtl8192cu AP mode is broken when a STA is using PS,
since the driver does not update its beacon to account for TIM changes,
so a station that is sleeping will never learn that it has packets
buffered at the AP.
Looking at the code, the rtl8192cu driver implements neither the set_tim()
callback, nor does it explicitly update beacon data periodically, so it
has no way to learn that it had changed.
This results in the AP mode being virtually unusable with STAs that do
PS and don't allow for it to be disabled (IoT devices, mobile phones,
etc.).
I think the easiest fix here would be to implement set_tim() for example
the way rt2x00 driver does: queue a work or schedule a tasklet to update
the beacon data on the device.
Are there any plans to fix this?
The driver is listed as maintained by Ping-Ke.
Yeah, power save is hard and I'm not surprised that there are drivers
with broken power save mode support. If there's no fix available we
should stop supporting AP mode in the driver.
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/mac80211/api
clearly documents that "For AP mode, it must (...) react to the set_tim()
callback or fetch each beacon from mac80211".
The driver isn't doing either so no wonder the beacon it is sending
isn't getting updated.
As I have said above, it seems to me that all that needs to be done here
is to queue a work in a set_tim() callback, then call
send_beacon_frame() from rtlwifi/core.c from this work.
But I don't know the exact device semantics, maybe it needs some other
notification that the beacon has changed, too, or even tries to
manage the TIM bitmap by itself.
It would be a shame to lose the AP mode for such minor thing, though.
I would play with this myself, but unfortunately I don't have time
to work on this right now.
That's where my question to Realtek comes: are there plans to actually
fix this?
Yes, I am working on this. My only question is "if you are such an expert on the
problem, why do you not fix it?"
The example in rx200 is not particularly useful, and I have not found any other
examples.
Larry