+ spin_lock_bh(&ab->base_lock); + peer = ath11k_peer_find_by_id(ab, ts->peer_id); + if (peer) { + arsta = (struct ath11k_sta *)peer->sta->drv_priv; + status.sta = peer->sta; + status.skb = msdu; + status.info = info; + status.rate = &arsta->last_txrate; + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (peer) + ieee80211_tx_status_ext(ar->hw, &status); + else + dev_kfree_skb_any(msdu); + spin_unlock_bh(&ab->base_lock);Why ieee80211_tx_status_ext() kept under spin_lock? Thanks, Karthikeyan P
Thanks Karthikeyan for the review..Yes, spin lock could be avoided for ieee80211_tx_status_ext(). I will address this in next revision. Thanks pradeep
