On Thursday 18 September 2008 20:10:35 Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2008, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Thursday 18 September 2008 19:48:27 Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > Well no actually, when the radio state (software rfkill state in your words) > > > > No, "radio state" is _not_ "software rfkill state" in my words. > > It's an independent state. > > The actual physical radio state is a combined state of the two sw and hw state bits. > > If either bit blocks the radio, it's physically blocked. We cannot toggle the hw bit > > from software. > > Ah ok. In that case b43 should do: > > send HW_BLOCK when the hardware rfkill state is set to block > send SOFT_BLOCK when the software rfkill state is set to block > > But it shouldn't (and that change was the start of this discussion) send SOFT_BLOCK > when mac80211 disabled the radio. I'm kind of confused. You say one thing and revert it right in the next sentence. -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
