On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote: > On 3/10/21 2:14 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix > >>> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with > >>> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the > >>> code fall through to the next case. > >>> > >>> Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as > >>> implicit fall-through markings. > >>> > >>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > >>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> It's not cool that you ignore the comments you got in [1], then after a > >> while mark the patch as "RESEND" and not even include a changelog why it > >> was resent. > >> > >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/d522f387b2d0dde774785c7169c1f25aa529989d.1605896060.git.gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Hm, this conversation looks like a miscommunication, mainly? I see > > Gustavo, as requested by many others[1], replacing the fallthrough > > comments with the "fallthrough" statement. (This is more than just a > > "Clang doesn't parse comments" issue.) > > > > This could be a tree-wide patch and not bother you, but Greg KH has > > generally advised us to send these changes broken out. Anyway, this > > change still needs to land, so what would be the preferred path? I think > > Gustavo could just carry it for Linus to merge without bothering you if > > that'd be preferred? > > I'll respond with the same I did last time, fallthrough is not C and > it's ugly. I understand your point of view, but this is not the consensus[1] of the community. "fallthrough" is a macro, using the GCC fallthrough attribute, with the expectation that we can move to the C17/C18 "[[fallthrough]]" statement once it is finalized by the C standards body. -Kees [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#implicit-switch-case-fall-through -- Kees Cook