From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> tasklet_kill() spin waits for TASKLET_STATE_SCHED to be cleared invoking yield() from inside the loop. yield() is an ill defined mechanism and the result might still be wasting CPU cycles in a tight loop which is especially painful in a guest when the CPU running the tasklet is scheduled out. tasklet_kill() is used in teardown paths and not performance critical at all. Replace the spin wait with wait_var_event(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/softirq.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c @@ -532,6 +532,16 @@ void __tasklet_hi_schedule(struct taskle } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__tasklet_hi_schedule); +static inline bool tasklet_clear_sched(struct tasklet_struct *t) +{ + if (test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) { + wake_up_var(&t->state); + return true; + } + + return false; +} + static void tasklet_action_common(struct softirq_action *a, struct tasklet_head *tl_head, unsigned int softirq_nr) @@ -551,8 +561,7 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct if (tasklet_trylock(t)) { if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) { - if (!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, - &t->state)) + if (!tasklet_clear_sched(t)) BUG(); if (t->use_callback) t->callback(t); @@ -612,13 +621,11 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct if (in_interrupt()) pr_notice("Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt\n"); - while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) { - do { - yield(); - } while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)); - } + while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) + wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)); + tasklet_unlock_wait(t); - clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state); + tasklet_clear_sched(t); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(tasklet_kill);