On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:32:41 +0000 Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently the expression ~nic_conf1 is always true because nic_conf1
> is a u16 and according to 6.5.3.3 of the C standard the ~ operator
> promotes the u16 to an integer before flipping all the bits. Thus
> the top 16 bits of the integer result are all set so the expression
> is always true. If the intention was to flip all the bits of nic_conf1
> then casting the integer result back to a u16 is a suitabel fix.
>
> Interestingly static analyzers seem to thing a bitwise ! should be
> used instead of ~ for this scenario
In what way? The condition is nic_conf1 != 0xffff AFAICT, how would we
do that with !?
> so I think the original intent
> of the expression may need some extra consideration.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logical vs. bitwise operator")
> Fixes: c869f77d6abb ("add mt7601u driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@xxxxx>
Thanks for the fix!
