On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:43 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Now it must do something like this in pseudo-code:
>
> 1. if (the bit is disabled (i.e. SW rfkill is NOT ACTIVE)) {
> rfkill-SW-status = disabled;
> } else if (the bit is enabled (i.e. SW rfkill is ACTIVE)) {
> if (tx power off is NOT ACTIVE)
> rfkill-SW-status = enabled;
> else
> rfkill-SW-status = whatever the user asked
> }
>
> THEN, it should use rfkill-sw-status, along with the hw rfkill line status,
> to synthesize the state it must pass to rfkill_force_status().
>
> ICK. Of course, if the driver has another way to implement txpower off that
> does not clash with sw rfkill, the above is unneeded.
Why are we not handling soft-rfkill in mac80211 entirely?
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
