samirweng1979 <samirweng1979@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > -ENOMEM has been used as a return value,it is not necessary to > assign it, and if kzalloc fail,not need free it,so just return > -ENOMEM when kzalloc fail. > > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> You sent the previous version just five days ago: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210203060306.2832-1-samirweng1979@xxxxxxx/ We maintainers are busy and usually takes some time to review the patch. So please avoid resending patches in such short intervals. Patch set to Superseded. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210208022535.17672-1-samirweng1979@xxxxxxx/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
