Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Register rrsr determines the response rate we send. > In field tests, using rate higher than current tx rate could lead > to difficulty for the receiving end to receive management/control > frames. Calculate current modulation level by tx rate then cross out > rate higher than those. > > Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> Based on the discussion I understood there will be v5. But let me know if I misunderstood. 8 patches set to Changes Requested. 12021961 [v4,1/8] rtw88: add dynamic rrsr configuration 12021963 [v4,2/8] rtw88: add rts condition 12021965 [v4,3/8] rtw88: add napi support 12021967 [v4,4/8] rtw88: replace tx tasklet with work queue 12021969 [v4,5/8] rtw88: 8822c: update MAC/BB parameter tables to v60 12022005 [v4,6/8] rtw88: 8822c: update RF_A parameter tables to v60 12022001 [v4,7/8] rtw88: 8822c: update RF_B (1/2) parameter tables to v60 12022003 [v4,8/8] rtw88: 8822c: update RF_B (2/2) parameter tables to v60 -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210115092405.8081-2-pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
