On 2/3/21 4:51 PM, samirweng1979 wrote: > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > remove duplicate word 'we' in comment > change 'then' to 'than' in comment > > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c > index c861811..ad95f9e 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c > @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, > * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities > * either the alignment is already present between > * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we > - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len > + * have to move the header less than the iv_len > * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes > * for the iv data. > * When the alignment must be added manually we must > -- ~Randy
