Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: realtek: Fix the word association defautly de-faulty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21:33 Tue 05 Jan 2021, Julian Calaby wrote:
Hi Bhaskar,

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:19 PM Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

s/defautly/de-faulty/p


Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c
index c948dafa0c80..7d02d8abb4eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ bool rtl88ee_is_tx_desc_closed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 hw_queue, u16 index)
        u8 own = (u8)rtl88ee_get_desc(hw, entry, true, HW_DESC_OWN);

        /*beacon packet will only use the first
-        *descriptor defautly,and the own may not
+        *descriptor de-faulty,and the own may not

Really? "de-faultly" isn't any better than "defaultly" and in fact
it's even worse as it breaks up the word "default".

hey, it was written as "defautly" ...and that was simple spelling mistake ..
so,corrected it.

This change doesn't make sense and the comment really needs to be
completely re-written by someone who understands what's going on here
as it barely makes sense.

Thanks,

--
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux