greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This makes per-chain RSSI be more consistent between HT20, HT40, HT80. > Instead of doing precise log math for adding dbm, I did a rough estimate, > it seems to work good enough. > > Tested on ath10k-ct 9984 firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Commented out code etc so I assume this is an RFC. Has anyone tested this with upstream firmware? Patch set to RFC. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20191217183343.25585-1-greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
