On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 22:20 +0200, Mattias Nissler wrote: > Well, I'm a big fan of modularizing everything in a clean way. This > whole mac80211 thingy is complex enough... But I don't really care as > long as everybody here is happy with it. Let's wait what Mikko says, > it's his code so far. Sure. If you manage to split it out entirely, maybe by some struct that drivers embed in their private vif struct, that'd be great too. > > But ACK is getting confusing, we're just reporting status based on > > reception (or non-reception!) of ACKs :) How about retries in the hw? > > Retries in the hw? I don't understand? You mean that as a name? Well, with all this we won't know how many times the hardware attempted to send a frame before it got an ACK, if it got one at all. We'd like to know this too, I guess, for the rate control algorithm. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
