On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 08:15:59AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 10:09 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple > > warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of > > letting the code fall through to the next case. > > Thanks Gustavo. > > I think this is better style than the gcc allowed > undescribed fallthrough to break; > > gcc developers disagree though: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432 Yeah; I mention that in this[1] changelog text, together with the reasons why we think the Clang approach is safer. which is exactly the same information contained in the link[2] included in the changelog text for this commit. -- Gustavo [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4169e889e5889405d54cec27d6e9f7f0ce3c7096 [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
