Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ssb/pcihost_wrapper.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pcihost_wrapper.c b/drivers/ssb/pcihost_wrapper.c
> index 410215c16920..6510f57469a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/pcihost_wrapper.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/pcihost_wrapper.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> #include <linux/ssb/ssb.h>
>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int ssb_pcihost_suspend(struct device *d)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(d);
> @@ -62,8 +61,6 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops ssb_pcihost_pm_ops = {
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ssb_pcihost_suspend, ssb_pcihost_resume)
> };
>
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> -
> static int ssb_pcihost_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> @@ -125,9 +122,7 @@ int ssb_pcihost_register(struct pci_driver *driver)
> {
> driver->probe = ssb_pcihost_probe;
> driver->remove = ssb_pcihost_remove;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> driver->driver.pm = &ssb_pcihost_pm_ops;
> -#endif
>
> return pci_register_driver(driver);
> }
I'm not convinced that this is correct. How have you confirmed that
there are no compiler or sparse warnings?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
