Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC 1/2] nl80211: add common API to configure SAR power limitations.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-11-05 16:35, Kalle Valo wrote:
Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

+ ath10k

[ I realize I replied to the "wrong" RFC v1; I fell trap to Kalle's note:

"When you submit a new version mark it as "v2". Otherwise people don't
know what's the latest version." ]

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:32 PM Carl Huang <cjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2020-11-04 10:00, Brian Norris wrote:
> What are the ABI guarantees around a given driver/chip's 'sar_capa'?
> Do we guarantee that if the driver supports N ranges of certain bands,
> that it will always continue to support those bands?
...
For a given chip(at least a QCOM chip), we don't see that the
range will grow or change.

That's good to know. But that's not quite the same as an ABI guarantee.

I'm not sure if I understood Brian's question correctly, but I have
concerns on the assumption that frequency ranges never change. For
example, in ath10k we have a patch[1] under discussion which adds more
channels and in ath11k we added 6 GHz band after initial ath11k support
landed. And I would not be surprised if in some boards/platforms a
certain band is disabled due to cotting costs (no antenna etc). My
preference is to have a robust interface which would be designed to
handle these kind of changes.

[1] [PATCH] ath10k: enable advertising support for channels 32, 68 and 98

So the trick here is even if more channels are supported, it doesn't mean that it can support different SAR setting on these new channels. In this case, it likely falls into 5G range. It's safe for driver to extend the 5G range and doesn't break userspace. (68 and 98 are already in the 5G range, so driver just
extends the start edge freq to 32 here.).

But for flexibility, given 6 GHz as example here, let's keep the explicit
index for SET command. For sar_capa advertisement, the explicit index is
dropped as Johannes suggested. New ranges can only be appended to existing ones. Like Brian said, only add or split is allowed. The complexity to handle
splitted range Vs whole range is left to WLAN driver itself.

Userspace can SET any ranges which are advertised by WLAN driver. It's
not required to set all ranges and userspace can skip any ranges.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux