Makes sense I guess. My room is 7m^2 so can't test beyond that. Small room issues, or well, not issues, I guess. - Kodehawa El lun., 19 oct. 2020 a las 14:10, Larry Finger (<Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>) escribió: > > On 10/18/20 4:11 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > > David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > >> > >> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT > >> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi > >> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I > >> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a > >> BT device paired breaks?) > > > > If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex > > issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple > > reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11. > > > > I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to > > wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30092-1-kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Kalle, > > I had generated and applied that trivial patch to my GitHub repo with the rtw88 > drivers a couple of months ago. Yes, it does get the user past the > initialization check; however, wifi performance is abysmal according the the > users of the repo. It seems that the antenna selection of rfe 2 models affects > wifi as well as BT. Applying this patch will get wifi running; however, the > users will need to be within 1 m of the AP for it to work! I do not have an > RTL8821CE chip, thus I have not tested myself. > > Larry >
