Luca Coelho <luca@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 10:10 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> >
>> > > Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > This is a rebased/re-worked set of patches which have been
>> > > > > previously posted to the mailing list(s).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
>> > > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
>> > > > > niggly little warnings.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There are quite a few W=1 warnings in the Wireless. My plan
>> > > > > is to work through all of them over the next few weeks.
>> > > > > Hopefully it won't be too long before drivers/net/wireless
>> > > > > builds clean with W=1 enabled.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Lee Jones (29):
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: rs: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: tx: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: lib: Demote non-compliant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: calib: Demote seemingly unintentional kerneldoc header
>> > > > > wil6210: Fix a couple of formatting issues in 'wil6210_debugfs_init'
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: sta: Demote a bunch of nonconformant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: mvm: ops: Remove unused static struct 'iwl_mvm_debug_names'
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: Demote a couple of nonconformant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: mvm: utils: Fix some doc-rot
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: scan: Demote a few nonconformant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: rxon: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: mvm: tx: Demote misuse of kernel-doc headers
>> > > > > iwlwifi: dvm: devices: Fix function documentation formatting issues
>> > > > > iwlwifi: iwl-drv: Provide descriptions debugfs dentries
>> > > > > wil6210: wmi: Fix formatting and demote non-conforming function
>> > > > > headers
>> > > > > wil6210: interrupt: Demote comment header which is clearly not
>> > > > > kernel-doc
>> > > > > wil6210: txrx: Demote obvious abuse of kernel-doc
>> > > > > wil6210: txrx_edma: Demote comments which are clearly not kernel-doc
>> > > > > wil6210: pmc: Demote a few nonconformant kernel-doc function headers
>> > > > > wil6210: wil_platform: Demote kernel-doc header to standard comment
>> > > > > block
>> > > > > wil6210: wmi: Correct misnamed function parameter 'ptr_'
>> > > > > ath6kl: wmi: Remove unused variable 'rate'
>> > > > > ath9k: ar9002_initvals: Remove unused array
>> > > > > 'ar9280PciePhy_clkreq_off_L1_9280'
>> > > > > ath9k: ar9001_initvals: Remove unused array 'ar5416Bank6_9100'
>> > > > > ath9k: ar5008_initvals: Remove unused table entirely
>> > > > > ath9k: ar5008_initvals: Move ar5416Bank{0,1,2,3,7} to where they are
>> > > > > used
>> > > > > brcmsmac: phytbl_lcn: Remove unused array 'dot11lcn_gain_tbl_rev1'
>> > > > > brcmsmac: phy_lcn: Remove unused variable
>> > > > > 'lcnphy_rx_iqcomp_table_rev0'
>> > > >
>> > > > What's happening with all of these iwlwifi patches?
>> > > >
>> > > > Looks like they are still not applied.
>> > >
>> > > Luca (CCed) takes iwlwifi patches to his iwlwifi tree.
>> >
>> > Thanks Kalle.
>> >
>> > Luca,
>> >
>> > Do you know why these patches have not been applied yet? Do you
>> > plan on applying them this week? -rc1 is not due for release for
>> > nearly 3 weeks now that Linus tagged an -rc8.
>>
>> I can also take Lee's patches directly to wireless-drivers-next, if
>> that's easier for Luca.
>
> Yes, please take these patches directly. It simplifies things.
Ok, I have assigned all Lee's pending iwlwifi patches to me on
patchwork.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
