From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> If extended NSS capability is used, the NSS for 160 may be lower than for 80. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> --- .../net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs-fw.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs-fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs-fw.c index 6f4d241d47e9..012123268ba9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs-fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs-fw.c @@ -195,14 +195,20 @@ rs_fw_vht_set_enabled_rates(const struct ieee80211_sta *sta, { u16 supp; int i, highest_mcs; - u8 nss = sta->rx_nss; + u8 max_nss = sta->rx_nss; + struct ieee80211_vht_cap ieee_vht_cap = { + .vht_cap_info = cpu_to_le32(vht_cap->cap), + .supp_mcs = vht_cap->vht_mcs, + }; /* the station support only a single receive chain */ if (sta->smps_mode == IEEE80211_SMPS_STATIC) - nss = 1; + max_nss = 1; - for (i = 0; i < nss && i < IWL_TLC_NSS_MAX; i++) { - highest_mcs = rs_fw_vht_highest_rx_mcs_index(vht_cap, i + 1); + for (i = 0; i < max_nss && i < IWL_TLC_NSS_MAX; i++) { + int nss = i + 1; + + highest_mcs = rs_fw_vht_highest_rx_mcs_index(vht_cap, nss); if (!highest_mcs) continue; @@ -211,7 +217,15 @@ rs_fw_vht_set_enabled_rates(const struct ieee80211_sta *sta, supp &= ~BIT(IWL_TLC_MNG_HT_RATE_MCS9); cmd->ht_rates[i][IWL_TLC_HT_BW_NONE_160] = cpu_to_le16(supp); - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) + /* + * Check if VHT extended NSS indicates that the bandwidth/NSS + * configuration is supported - only for MCS 0 since we already + * decoded the MCS bits anyway ourselves. + */ + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160 && + ieee80211_get_vht_max_nss(&ieee_vht_cap, + IEEE80211_VHT_CHANWIDTH_160MHZ, + 0, true, nss) >= nss) cmd->ht_rates[i][IWL_TLC_HT_BW_160] = cmd->ht_rates[i][IWL_TLC_HT_BW_NONE_160]; } -- 2.28.0