On 2020-09-04 21:04, Ben Greear wrote:
On 9/4/20 8:00 AM, akolli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2020-09-03 22:53, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The code is trying to create an ath11k directory on debugfs
root, but that fails when there is a second radio (and thus
second instance of the driver).
Hi Ben,
IPQ8074 is soc and it does not need second debugfs entry, its on AHB.
QCA6390 is a pci card and multiple debug entries are needed if
multiple cards are available,
I am planning to post a patch with bus specific abstraction function
which creates single debugfs for soc based radios and multiple entries
for PCI based radios.
AHB:
debugfs/ath11k/IPQ8074/
PCI
debugfs/ath11k/QCA6390_0001:01:00.0/
debugfs/ath11k/QCA6390_0000:01:00.0/
I appreciate your feedback on this!
Why not just stick with the way ath10k does, having the ath11k debugfs
entry be
under the phy debugfs directory?
Maybe there is a high-level design document for the ath11k driver
somewhere that
explains how and why it is architected with the ath11k base object
holding multiple
phy objects?
The initial ath11k driver was supporting IPQ8074, its an SOC and has
3-radios under wifi0,
- few entries in debugfs are common for SOC,all these are under
debugfs/ath11k/IPQ8074/
"simulate_fw_crash"
"soc_dp_stats"
- few entries are per radio, these are under
debugfs/ath11k/IPQ8074/mac0/
"ext_tx_stats"
"ext_rx_stats"
"pktlog_filter"
debugfs/ath11k/IPQ8074/mac1
"ext_tx_stats"
"ext_rx_stats"
"pktlog_filter"
debugfs/ath11k/IPQ8074/mac2
"ext_tx_stats"
"ext_rx_stats"
"pktlog_filter"
And, very curious to know if you are able to get multiple QCA6390 NICs
running on the
same system, I'm seeing all sort of problems including NICs not always
showing up in lspci
and such.
I am not aware of this, like to understand the output of, qrtr-lookup
cmd
Thanks
Anil
