On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 01:14 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> @@ -1104,16 +1133,12 @@ static void ieee80211_associated(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - if (disassoc && sta)
> - sta_info_destroy(sta);
> -
> - if (disassoc) {
> - ifsta->state = IEEE80211_STA_MLME_DISABLED;
> - ieee80211_set_associated(sdata, ifsta, 0);
> - } else {
> + if (disassoc)
> + ieee80211_set_disassoc(sdata, ifsta, 1, 1,
> + WLAN_REASON_PREV_AUTH_NOT_VALID);
> + else
> mod_timer(&ifsta->timer, jiffies +
> IEEE80211_MONITORING_INTERVAL);
> - }
> }
>
>
This hunk has another bug, or rather, we need to add this hunk:
@@ -1084,7 +1114,6 @@ static void ieee80211_associated(struct
"range\n",
sdata->dev->name, print_mac(mac, ifsta->bssid));
disassoc = 1;
- sta_info_unlink(&sta);
} else
ieee80211_send_probe_req(sdata, ifsta->bssid,
local->scan_ssid,
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
