On 8/25/20 9:30 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
Also, while technically the regressing commit (e18696786548 ("mwifiex: Prevent memory corruption handling keys")) was fixing a potential overflow, the encasing command structure (struct host_cmd_ds_command) is a union of a ton of other command layouts, and likely had plenty of padding at the end, which would at least explain why non-malicious scenarios weren't problematic pre-commit-e18696786548.
This is pretty much spot on, although as far as I can tell, the padding comes from struct mwifiex_ie_type_key_param_set_v2. That contains a key_params member, which is a union over all supported key types, including other 256 bit types (like struct mwifiex_wapi_param). I should also note that this fix also affects mwifiex_set_aes_key_v2(), where sizeof(struct mwifiex_aes_param) is used to calculate the command length of what looks like a command being sent to the chip. This should probably be reviewed by someone with a bit more inside knowledge about the driver, as this could potentially break something due to the commit changing it from 16 to 32. I think, however, that this might actually also fix a potential issue when setting 256 bit AES keys. Regards, Max