On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:24 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 01:14 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> This series should fix mac problems in disassociation > >> There are two basic problems disassociation in current implementation. > >> The order of steps in the dissociation flow and missing proper > >> disassociation when moving from one AP to another. > > > > Mind if I adopt this patch series? I've done only slight modifications > > so far (the int->bool thing I asked for) and have rebased all the > > patches I had already posted on top of it. The arguments to > > ieee80211_set_disassoc are changing a lot in my patch series anyway so > > I'll just work on top of the bool/bool thing and then fix it up, ok? > > Don't mind just need to test them properly and update commit messages. > Any suggestion how we do that? I've already changed the commit messages slightly, you can find my versions at http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/ (disassoc-part-{1,2,3}.patch). If you want to test those by themselves that would probably be useful, and if you want to test my complete mlme rewrite I'd appreciate that too, but I'm not done rebasing yet :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
