On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:29:36AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
> We have some reasons to kill netdev->priv:
> 1. netdev->priv is equal to netdev_priv().
> 2. netdev_priv() wraps the calculation of netdev->priv's offset, obviously
> netdev_priv() is more flexible than netdev->priv.
> But we cann't kill netdev->priv, because so many drivers reference to it
> directly.
>
> OK, becasue Dave S. Miller said, "every direct netdev->priv usage is a bug",
> and I want to kill netdev->priv later, I decided to convert all the direct
> reference of netdev->priv first.
>
> Different to readonly reference of netdev->priv, in this driver, netdev->priv
> was changed. I use netdev->ml_priv to replace netdev->priv.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Same comment as the other patch.
Also, I have to be honest and say that I had never been aware of
dev->ml_priv before, so I'm not entirely sure what it is. However,
from the comment at it's definision ("mid-layer private") and it's
usage in qeth, loopback, and ppp, I'm not at all sure that you are
using it as intended.
Can you explain?
Thanks,
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
