Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 3/6] brcmfmac: reserve 2 credits for host tx control path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 06/09/2020 7:51, Kalle Valo wrote:
Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

From: Amar Shankar <amsr@xxxxxxxxxxx>

It is observed that sometimes when sdiod is low in tx credits in low
rssi scenarios, the data path consumes all sdiod rx all credits and
there is no sdiod rx credit available for control path causing host
and card to go out of sync resulting in link loss between host and
card. So in order to prevent it some credits are reserved for control
path.

Note that TXCTL_CREDITS can't be larger than the firmware default
credit update threshold 2; otherwise there will be a deadlock for both
side waiting for each other.

Signed-off-by: Amar Shankar <amsr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Shyr Chuang <saint.chuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
index ce6f15284277..163bb7f41e44 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
@@ -635,6 +635,8 @@ static const struct brcmf_firmware_mapping brcmf_sdio_fwnames[] = {
  	BRCMF_FW_ENTRY(CY_CC_43012_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFFF, 43012)
  };
+#define TXCTL_CREDITS 2
+
  static void pkt_align(struct sk_buff *p, int len, int align)
  {
  	uint datalign;
@@ -647,6 +649,14 @@ static void pkt_align(struct sk_buff *p, int len, int align)
/* To check if there's window offered */
  static bool data_ok(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
+{
+	/* Reserve TXCTL_CREDITS credits for txctl */
+	return (u8)(bus->tx_max - bus->tx_seq) > TXCTL_CREDITS &&
+	       ((u8)(bus->tx_max - bus->tx_seq) & 0x80) == 0;
+}

Why casting to u8? Is it really necessary?

I don't think the casting is necessary since tx_max and tx_seq are both u8.

The code is taken from a similar function data_ok(). I'll remove the casting from both functions in V2.







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux