Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] > (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. > "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either > simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. As a precursor > to removing[2] this[3] macro[4], just initialize this variable to NULL, > and make the (unreachable!) code do a conditional test. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@xxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [...] > @@ -4256,9 +4256,13 @@ static void b43_nphy_tx_gain_table_upload(struct b43_wldev *dev) > pga_gain = (table[i] >> 24) & 0xf; > pad_gain = (table[i] >> 19) & 0x1f; > if (b43_current_band(dev->wl) == NL80211_BAND_2GHZ) > - rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table[pad_gain]; > + rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table > + ? rf_pwr_offset_table[pad_gain] > + : 0; > else > - rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table[pga_gain]; > + rfpwr_offset = rf_pwr_offset_table > + ? rf_pwr_offset_table[pga_gain] > + : 0; To me this is ugly, isn't there a better way to fix this? -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
