On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:06:25AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 05:58:41PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:30:01AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:04 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > But it happens to work fine without 8ab65b03b7893da4a49009e7e356e36e27b0c407. > > > > > > That's really odd; that patch (the don't-send-empty-extended-rates-IE > > > patch) shouldn't have anything to do with this behavior, if it did you > > > wouldn't get associated to the AP in the first place I think. You're > > > 100% sure that this patch is causing the problem? > > > > No, not sure. But reverting it seems to have helped. > > And there does not seem to be anything else relevant between rc4 and > > rc5. > > So you determined that commit by eye rather than by git bisect? Yes. > Any chance I could talk you into confirming that using git bisect? It's a bit time consuming because the bug triggers often, but not in 100% of suspends. So you need to fiddle with it a bit after each bisect to figure out whether it's there. > Thanks, > > John > -- > John W. Linville > linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
