On 5/29/2020 10:19 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 10:16 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
The 6GHz band does not have regulatory approval yet, but things are
moving forward. However, that has led to a change in the channelization
of the 6GHz band which has been accepted in the 11ax specification.
case NL80211_BAND_6GHZ:
- /* see 802.11ax D4.1 27.3.22.2 */
+ /* see 802.11ax D6.1 27.3.23.2 */
+ if (chan == 2)
+ return MHZ_TO_KHZ(5935);
I think Jouni said this was operating class 136?
+ /* 6GHz, channels 1..233 */
+ if (freq >= 5935 && freq <= 7115) {
+ switch (chandef->width) {
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20:
+ *op_class = 131;
+ break;
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_40:
+ *op_class = 132;
+ break;
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80:
+ *op_class = 133;
+ break;
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160:
+ *op_class = 134;
+ break;
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80P80:
+ *op_class = 135;
+ break;
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_5:
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_10:
+ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT:
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
If so, isn't that missing here?
At least should indeed take it into account here. However I can not get
my hands on the 6.1 spec (yet). I have the document with editor
instructions and operating class for channel 2 is marked as <ANA> in
table Annex E-4. 136 would be the logical value, but without the 6.1
spec I am not sure. I will resend the patch.
Regards,
Arend
