Both of you are right.
I neglected, and this patch is wrong.
Thanks.
On 2020/5/6 23:15, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 16:51 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 20:19 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 11:07 +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
This silences the following coccinelle warning:
"WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"
I suggest instead ignoring bad and irrelevant warnings.
PREFIX_LEN is 32 not 0x20 or BIT(5)
PCI_DUMP_SIZE is 352
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
[]
@@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ void iwl_trans_pcie_dump_regs(struct iwl_trans *trans)
/* Alloc a max size buffer */
alloc_size = PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC + 4 + PREFIX_LEN;
- alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_DUMP_SIZE + PREFIX_LEN);
- alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_MEM_DUMP_SIZE + PREFIX_LEN);
- alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_PARENT_DUMP_SIZE + PREFIX_LEN);
+ alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_DUMP_SIZE | PREFIX_LEN);
+ alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_MEM_DUMP_SIZE | PREFIX_LEN);
+ alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_PARENT_DUMP_SIZE | PREFIX_LEN);
buf = kmalloc(alloc_size, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!buf)
Yeah, those macros are clearly not bitmasks. I'm dropping this patch.
Can the cocci script that generated this warning
scripts/coccinelle/misc/orplus.cocci
be dropped or improved to validate the likelihood that
the defines or constants used are more likely than
not are bit values?
Maybe these should be defined as hex or BIT or BIT_ULL
or GENMASK or the like?
Right now it seems it just tests for two constants.
.
