>>> the related system resources were not released when pci_iomap() return >>> error in the rtw_pci_io_mapping() function. add pci_release_regions() to >>> fix it. >> >> How do you think about a wording variant like the following? >> >> Subject: >> [PATCH v2] net: rtw88: Complete exception handling in rtw_pci_io_mapping() >> >> Change description: >> A call of the function “pci_request_regions” can fail here. >> The corresponding system resources were not released then. >> Thus add a call of the function “pci_release_regions”. >> >> > Markus, I think my commit comments is a sufficiently clear description > for this patch. I got an other impression for specific aspects. > Someone has told me not to send commit comments again and again > when it is enough clear. My patch review tries should give you hints where I noticed wording weaknesses. The corresponding change tolerance can vary by involved contributors. > Because it only wastes the precious time of the maintainer > and very very little help for patch improvement. I hope that also your commit messages will improve. > BTW, In the past week, you asked me to change the commit comments in my > 6 patches like this one. Let me return to the essence of patch, point > out the code problems and better solutions will be more popular. I would appreciate if various update suggestions would become nicer somehow. Regards, Markus
