On Thursday 28 August 2008 12:52:36 Tomas Winkler wrote: > Do you know how the TSF is actually synchronized from the HW perspective? no, unfortuately i have no idea. also i should admit that we have problems with atheros hardware in that we don't know when the RX timestamp is taken exactly. this means our IBSS merge can't be 100% exact. but the usual case we need to catch is when the beacon TSF is much higher than the local TSF. i don't care about IBSS power-save right now. > > with the same HW but it did not work any more - i didn't have the time to > > investigate this issue... > > There is another IBSS bug that was introduced connected to rates maybe > this is also your problem.. we have something in the pipe that should > solve this. good, i'll retest once you subitted the patch. > Sure but if TSF is not adopted correctly and that's the case probably > of most of the drivers under mac80211 then it makes > worth. Just need to be aware of this. true, we need to find a way to support this hardware too... bruno -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
