On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/* (USB might need it?) > > rt2x00 doesn't have rfkill support for the USB drivers, only the PCI drivers, > (because only those cards could have an actual rfkill switch. Well, rfkill support is not related only to input devices, but also to transmitters. And EVERY transmitter MUST have one (and a single one) rfkill class attached to it, unless the hardware is completely and utterly unable to block its transmitter(s). I hope no rt2x00 device is like that... > Other then that no changes are required in rt2x00 with this patch. Which I will take to mean that all rt2x00 drivers, be them USB or PCI, will do whatever is needed (including shutting down transmitters explicitly, when the hardware doesn't do it implicitly because of something else the driver is doing) on their own suspend() methods. Is that correct? Because that's all patch 5 of 5 is concerned with. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
