On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 16:04 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:52 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:44 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > > > > user-space ieee80211_register_hw() RX IRQ > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > | | | > > > > > > |<---wlan0---wiphy_register() | > > > > > > |----start wlan0---->| | > > > > > > | |<---IRQ---(RX packet) > > > > > > | Kernel crash | > > > > > > | due to unallocated | > > > > > > | workqueue. | > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > I have understood that no frames should be received until mac80211 calls > > > > > struct ieee80211_ops::start: > > > > > > > > > > * @start: Called before the first netdevice attached to the hardware > > > > > * is enabled. This should turn on the hardware and must turn on > > > > > * frame reception (for possibly enabled monitor interfaces.) > > > > > > > > True, but I think he's saying that you can actually add and configure an > > > > interface as soon as the wiphy is registered? > > > > > > With '<---IRQ---(RX packet)' I assumed wcn36xx is delivering a frame to > > > mac80211 using ieee80211_rx(), but of course I'm just guessing here. > > > > Yeah, but that could be legitimate? > > Ah, I misunderstood then. The way I have understood is that no rx frames > should be delivered (= calling ieee80211_rx()_ before start() is called, > but if that's not the case please ignore me :) No no, that _is_ the case. But I think the "start wlan0" could end up calling it? johannes
