On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:52 AM <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > v3 -> v4 > * squashed with "rtw88: support dynamic user regulatory setting" > * modify the commit log > > v4 -> v5 > * no change > > v5 -> v6 > * remove custom world-wide, use stack world-wide > * surface error codes > > v6 -> v7 > * restore custom world-wide > * modify commit message to be more clear If it wasn't clear, v7 looks more like v5. I think I had some of my own misunderstanding of the regulatory core when reading/reviewing/testing v5, which resulted in ill-conceived changes in v6. I think I've gotten my head around this, and this looks fine to me. But that's not saying much, given how confused I was at times. Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
