On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:16:20AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > I suppose you're talking about the grand unified flow cache > that never gets implemented right? I classify that in the > same category as net channels at the moment, theoretically > very interesting but no practical implementation in sight. In any case, we could implement what I suggested even without a flow cache, by simply storing the info in the dst. This means that all flows on the same dst will end up in the same queue, which is not as good as what a flow cache could give, but it's useful enough to be an option. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
