On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 07:26 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > On 02/28/2020 02:06 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 17:11 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > > To sniff /AX stations, it is helpful to know their AID. So, any problems > > > with adding it to 'iw station dump' output? > > > > No, no problem at all. I guess it was just never added because it > > originally comes from userspace (hostapd), and so didn't really need to > > be sent back. But yeah, we have trivial infrastructure to send it back, > > so sure, why not. > > Ok, thanks for the response. > > From looking at debugfs for a station device, there is the netdev AID: > > cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy0/netdev\:wlan0/aid > 1 > > And there is a peer AID: > > cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy0/netdev\:wlan0/stations/04\:f0\:21\:c2\:fd\:b0/aid > 0 > > For sniffing AX, I'd need to use '1' here as far as I can tell. Maybe for station > devices the peer is always zero? And for AP devices, the peer IDs are what is useful > and the netdev AID is not? Yeah. The first is u.mgd.aid (i.e. the netdev data), and the latter is the STA AID. It makes sense the latter is not assigned in the client-side case. Arguably, only the *latter* should be in nl80211 per STA, since in the client-side case it's *our* AID, not the APs. johannes
