On Wed, 2020-01-15 at 21:23 -0800, Thomas Pedersen wrote: > On 1/14/20 12:00 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > Is there a list of known passing hwsim tests somewhere? > > > > > > Maybe a subset of suites / tests you like to see passing as a smoke test? > > > > Not really. > > > > > Or do you run through the 3300+ tests and expect them all to pass? > > > > Pretty much, yes. It takes <10 minutes on my quad-core desktop to run > > using the UML time-travel mode against recent kernels. > > > > I don't always get 100% pass on the first round, but the handful that > > fails sometimes I expect to pass when running just those manually with > > vm-run.sh. > > Thanks, I'll give UML time-travel mode a try. FWIW, I applied your patches yesterday. There was one issue remaining uncovered by them, but it wasn't actually related to your patches, just related to the test sending too many frames. I sent a workaround to the hostap list and also the "mac80211: use more bits for ack_frame_id" to the kernel to fix that. johannes
