On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 02:15:18AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 06.01.2020 22:19, Jean-Philippe Brucker пишет:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 05:37:58PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> I haven't seen any driver probe failures due to OOB on NVIDIA Tegra,
> >> only suspend-resume was problematic due to the unbalanced OOB
> >> interrupt-wake enabling.
> >>
> >> But maybe checking whether OOB interrupt-wake works by invoking
> >> enable_irq_wake() during brcmf_sdiod_intr_register() causes trouble for
> >> the cubietruck board.
> >>
> >> @Jean-Philippe, could you please try this change (on top of recent
> >> linux-next):
> >
> > Sorry for the delay, linux-next doesn't boot for me at the moment and I
> > have little time to investigate why, so I might retry closer to the merge
> > window.
> >
> > However, isn't the interrupt-wake issue independent from the problem
> > (introduced in v4.17) that my patch fixes? I applied "brcmfmac: Keep OOB
> > wake-interrupt disabled when it shouldn't be enabled" on v5.5-rc5 and it
> > doesn't seem to cause a regression, but the wifi only works if I apply my
> > patch as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jean
> >
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> >> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> >> index b684a5b6d904..80d7106b10a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> >> @@ -115,13 +115,6 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_intr_register(struct brcmf_sdio_dev
> >> *sdiodev)
> >> }
> >> sdiodev->oob_irq_requested = true;
> >>
> >> - ret = enable_irq_wake(pdata->oob_irq_nr);
> >> - if (ret != 0) {
> >> - brcmf_err("enable_irq_wake failed %d\n", ret);
> >> - return ret;
> >> - }
> >> - disable_irq_wake(pdata->oob_irq_nr);
> >> -
> >> sdio_claim_host(sdiodev->func1);
> >>
> >> if (sdiodev->bus_if->chip == BRCM_CC_43362_CHIP_ID) {
>
> Hello Jean,
>
> Could you please clarify whether you applied [1] and then the above
> snippet on top of it or you only applied [1] without the snippet?
I applied [1] without the snippet
Thanks,
Jean
>
> [1] brcmfmac: Keep OOB wake-interrupt disabled when it shouldn't be enabled
