Markus Theil <markus.theil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 1/6/20 12:16 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> Markus Theil <markus.theil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Some extended feature flags were not considered before. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Markus Theil <markus.theil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> info.c | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/info.c b/info.c >>> index 38362d8..0f24dae 100644 >>> --- a/info.c >>> +++ b/info.c >>> @@ -676,7 +676,17 @@ broken_combination: >>> ext_feat_print(tb, DFS_OFFLOAD, "DFS offload"); >>> ext_feat_print(tb, CONTROL_PORT_OVER_NL80211, >>> "control port over nl80211"); >>> + ext_feat_print(tb, ACK_SIGNAL_SUPPORT, >>> + "ack signal level support"); >>> ext_feat_print(tb, TXQS, "FQ-CoDel-enabled intermediate TXQs"); >>> + ext_feat_print(tb, SCAN_RANDOM_SN, >>> + "use random sequence numbers in scans"); >>> + ext_feat_print(tb, SCAN_MIN_PREQ_CONTENT, >>> + "use probe request with only rate IEs in scans"); >>> + ext_feat_print(tb, CAN_REPLACE_PTK0, >>> + "can safely replace PTK 0 when rekeying"); >>> + ext_feat_print(tb, ENABLE_FTM_RESPONDER, >>> + "enable FTM (Fine Time Measurement) responder"); >>> ext_feat_print(tb, AIRTIME_FAIRNESS, >>> "airtime fairness scheduling"); >> I would prefer to keep TXQS and AIRTIME_FAIRNESS next to each other. >> >> Also, while you're at it, could you please add the newly-added AQL >> feature? Something like >> >> ext_feat_print(tb, AIRTIME_FAIRNESS, >> "airtime fairness scheduling"); >> + ext_feat_print(tb, AQL, >> + "Airtime Queue Limits (AQL)"); > I'm currently working on some other small patches and will include this > and reorder the flags such that TXQS and AIRTIME_FAIRNESS will be next > to each other. > Thanks for the hint! Great, thanks! :) -Toke
