Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Per-chain rssi should sum the secondary channels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/17/19 10:29 AM, Tom Psyborg wrote:
On 17/12/2019, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/17/19 8:23 AM, Justin Capella wrote:
I believe someone recently submitted a patch that defined noise floors
per band (2/5).

I looked at using the real noise floor.  Our radio was reporting a noise
floor of around -102,
where the hard-coded default is -95.  This of course would make the reported
RSSI lower by 7db
in that case.  I am not sure that is correct.


Hi

I am getting similar NF values with all my ath10k devices, I thought
default was changed since ath9k from -95 to -115 just like in the
vendor driver? There were some discussions about it on mailing list.
On some channels (5Ghz) the value goes down to about -107, even saw
-110 once.


If you use ath9k and ath10k on same channel/environment, do you see similar
RSSI reported (especially with the ath10k patch I just posted)?

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux