Would it make sense to consider skb->priority / QoS in the Access Classifier selection? On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:26 PM Yibo Zhao <yiboz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This series fix some issues when enabling virtual time-based airtime scheduler on ath10k. > > Changes since v3: > Change schedule_pos to previous node once it has chance to be moved/removed > from current position in the tree in loop scenario and bring back schedule_round > in case that same node is to be scheduled again in the mean time. > > Increase airtime grace period to 2000 us in the first patch. > > Put per-AC station weight checking in its lock during configuration from application. > > Changes since v2: > Changes station airtime weight to be per-AC based to avoid sync issue > Remove Co-developed-by and Toke's sign-off as Toke suggested > > Changes since v1: > Modify the author of Co-developed-by as Johannes suggested > > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (1): > mac80211: Switch to a virtual time-based airtime scheduler > > Yibo Zhao (3): > mac80211: fix issue in loop scenario > mac80211: fix low throughput in multi-clients situation > mac80211: Sync airtime weight sum with per AC synced sta airtime > weight together > > net/mac80211/cfg.c | 29 +++++- > net/mac80211/debugfs.c | 48 +++++++++- > net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c | 18 ++-- > net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 12 ++- > net/mac80211/main.c | 2 +- > net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 25 +++-- > net/mac80211/sta_info.h | 8 +- > net/mac80211/tx.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 8 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1
