On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 15:55 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 15:09 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > > If we're doing this on a per-driver basis, let's make it a proper > > > NL80211_EXT_FEATURE and expose it to userspace; that way users can at > > > least discover if it's supported on their device. I can send a patch > > > adding that... > > > > Sure. Just didn't get to that yet, but if you want to send a patch > > that's very welcome. I have to run out now, will be back in the evening > > at most. > > Patch here (for those not following linux-wireless): > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=215107 Thanks! Maybe I should roll that into a single patch so it's actually easier to apply as a bugfix while keeping ath10k on AQL for 5.5, otherwise it could be argued that the ath10k patch is a feature for -next ... > > > Maybe we should untangle this from airtime_flags completely, since if we > > > just use the flags people could conceivably end up disabling it by > > > mistake, couldn't they? > > > > Yes, that sounds like a good plan, now I was wondering why it's there > > anyway. > > Convenience, I think :) :) johannes
