On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:42 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:42 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> No replies from anyone (including Wen) for 3 months about testing this > >> patch on anything else than QCA6174. So I'll drop this now, please > >> resubmit once test coverage is better. > > > > I know this isn't exactly what you're asking for, but FWIW we've been > > using this since late November on all our QCA6174 products. No issues > > seen as far as I know, and we have seen some power savings. > > Thanks for the feedback, this is very good to know. I also would like to > apply this but not before we have some testing feedback from AP chipsets > like QCA988X or QCA9984. Wen, are you planning to test those and > resubmit? May I ping here? We (Chromium OS) are continuing to carry this patch, and would love to come up with something that can land upstream. If necessary, I can rework it to apply more specifically -- e.g., only to QCA6174 PCI IDs. Thanks, Brian
