Commit 78d3fd0b7de8 ("gro: Only use skb_gro_header for completely
non-linear packets") back in May'09 (2.6.31-rc1) has changed the
original condition '!skb_headlen(skb)' to the current
'skb_mac_header(skb) == skb_tail_pointer(skb)' in gro_reset_offset()
saying: "Since the drivers that need this optimisation all provide
completely non-linear packets".
For now, we have the following rough statistics for 5.4-rc7:
1) napi_gro_frags: 14
2) napi_gro_receive with skb->head containing (most of) payload: 83
3) napi_gro_receive with skb->head containing all the headers: 20
4) napi_gro_receive with skb->head containing only Ethernet header: 2
With the current condition, fast GRO with the usage of
NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0 is available only in the [1] case.
Packets pushed by [2] and [3] go through the 'slow' path, but
it's not a problem for them as they already contains all the needed
headers in skb->head, so pskb_may_pull() only moves skb->data.
The layout of skbs in the fourth [4] case at the moment of
dev_gro_receive() is identical to skbs that have come through [1],
as napi_frags_skb() pulls Ethernet header to skb->head. The only
difference is that the mentioned condition is always false for them,
because skb_put() and friends irreversibly alter the tail pointer.
They also go though the 'slow' path, but now every single
pskb_may_pull() in every single .gro_receive() will call the *really*
slow __pskb_pull_tail() to pull headers to head. This significantly
decreases the overall performance for no visible reasons.
The only two users of method [4] is:
* drivers/staging/qlge
* drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi (all three variants: dvm, mvm, mvm-mq)
Note that in case with wireless drivers we can't use [1]
(napi_gro_frags()) at least for now and mac80211 stack always
performs pushes and pulls anyways, so performance hit is inavoidable.
We can simply change the condition in gro_reset_offset() to allow
skbs from [4] go through 'fast' path just like in case [1].
This was tested on a custom driver and this patch gave boosts up to
40 Mbps to method [4] in both directions comparing to net-next, which
made overall performance relatively close to [1] (without it, [4] is
the slowest).
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/dev.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 1c799d486623..da78a433c10c 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5611,8 +5611,7 @@ static void skb_gro_reset_offset(struct sk_buff *skb)
NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0 = NULL;
NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0_len = 0;
- if (skb_mac_header(skb) == skb_tail_pointer(skb) &&
- pinfo->nr_frags &&
+ if (!skb_headlen(skb) && pinfo->nr_frags &&
!PageHighMem(skb_frag_page(frag0))) {
NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0 = skb_frag_address(frag0);
NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0_len = min_t(unsigned int,
--
2.24.0
